I try not to use Amazon. I prefer to shop locally, where at all possible. If I have to shop online, I at least try to shop Canadian. Usually, I am successful (this Christmas, zero Amazon purchases), although I am not above ordering through Amazon where all else fails, which very occasionally it does.
As well as trying to shop locally from an environmental viewpoint, I disapprove of many of Amazon's business practices, and the way it has steam-rollered through whole swathes of perfectly good business and whole sectors, Canadian and otherwise.
But is Amazon actually "evil" as my daughter has it?
Billionaire owner Jeff Bezos has grown his company into a commercial titan with a reputation for abusing its workforce (long shifts for inadequate pay, enforced overtime, constant electronic surveillance, summary firings for lagging productivity, workers pressed to their physical limits, unreasonable demands for employee self-sacrifice, inadequate safety measures, propagation of the gig economy, stern opposition to unionization, etc). This is known. All of that might well be enough for you to vow not to touch Amazon with a bargepole.
But there's more. Amazon has been accused of using its market power to deliberately stifle competition, to harm small businesses, to violate anti-trust laws, and generally to take advantage of its quasi-monopolistic position. The envionmental impact of its shipping operations is huge and wasteful. It has been criticized for cynically using tax loopholes to avoid paying its fair share of taxes. Its data collection and use policies have raised concerns about privacy and security. Its involvement in the shadier side of America's homeland security machine (including its facial recognition technology) has raised hackles among some. The list goes on.
I will continue to try to avoid Amazon as much as possible. We are, though, probably long past the point where it is possible to bring the company down, or even hold it to account. And the possibility remains that Amazon is just an uber-successful company with a rather more-rapacious-than-some go-get-'em corporate philosophy, and not actually evil, as The Economist argues (and others). Me, I'm incliued to go with the "evil" characterizatrion, on balance.
No comments:
Post a Comment