Hard on the heels of his provocative, inspiring and distinctly critical speech at Davos, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is apparently seriously considering joining Donald Trump's "Board of Peace", which is supposed to help bring about a just and lasting peace in Gaza (and maybe elsewhere).
While the end goal may be laudable, Carney should have nothing to do with this latest Trump vanity project. The UN did endorse the idea, but what has ultimately emerged is a far cry from what was promised and voted on, in a classic bait-and-switch move by Trump. Indeed, the Board's charter doesn't even mention Gaza!
Just look at the other members of this invitation-only club thus far: USA, Belarus, Azerbaijan, United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Hungary, Argentina, Armenia, and of course Israel (yes, the fox is expected to regulate the hen coop). It's a strange assortment of (mainly authoritarian, as it happens) states. Putin has apparently been asked, and is maybe thinking about it, as are Egypt, Turkey, Thailand, Germany, UK, Paraguay, India, China, Ukraine, Kosovo, Slovenia and Croatia. France's Emmanuel Macron has, sensibly, already summarily refused to be involved in such a group, as have Sweden and Norway.
Mr. Carney should certainly not even consider paying $1 billion to become a "permanent" member of the Board, rather than just a three-year member. (How ridiculous is that? Just how long is Trump planning on stringing this out? What is the money for?). And, thankfully, it seems like he is not thinking about it.
But Carney should follow some of the more sensible countries in not touching the Trump-led Board - what The Guardian calls his "imperial court", and what Trump probably thinks of as an alternative to the United Nations - with a bargepole.
UPDATE
It looked like Carney is off the hook, as Donald Trump publicly withdraws his invitation to Canada to join his ridiculous Board of Peace.
Trump didn't give any specific reason for the disinvitation, but most likely it was a fit of pique over Carney's damning (and less than complimentary to Trump) Davos speech, and not anything more thoughtful and insightful than that. Either way, we should probably all breath a sigh of relief that Mr. Carney doesn't have to involve himself with this whole flawed Trump-dominated enterprise.
No comments:
Post a Comment